skip to main navigation
 

Ecological Implications of Biomass Policies for Private Forests in the United States

Dr. Alan Lucier. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement.  April 2010.

  • Owners of working forests in the U.S. meet high standards of environmental performance through compliance with environmental laws and voluntary programs.  Ecological risks associated with increased biomass utilization are mitigated by existing legal and socioeconomic frameworks that encourage sustainable forest management.
  • Economic returns for wood production and forest-based manufacturing provide important means and incentives for investments in private forest stewardship and promote maintaining land in a forested condition.
  • Recently adopted biomass policy discourages use of biomass from naturally-regenerated forests, the establishment of new forest plantations, and utilizing traditional uses of biomass.  Such policy imposes high operating and opportunity costs on forest owners and encourages the conversion of private forests to other more economically competitive land uses.

LATEST NEWS

  • Comments on an USDA Forest Service report: Private Forests, Public Benefits. More

  • Senators Lincoln and Chambliss introduced legislation to affirm that if pesticides are applied according to EPA guidelines no additional permit is needed. More

  • NAFO submits comments to EPA underscoring the traditional use of biomass for energy. More

See All

LEGISLATIVE ACTION CENTER

Take action to conserve private forests.

More

FORESTRY JOURNAL

  • A video presentation exploring how using North American wood products helps mitigate climate change. More

  • Rep. Emerson makes the case that the EPA's action to over-regulate biomass energy will cost jobs and stifle a domestic, renewable, and sustainable energy supply. More

  • Over 100 members of Congress tell EPA Administrator Jackson that the proposed Boiler MACT rule will cost thousands of jobs and not impact human health or the environment. More

See All
 
back on top