skip to main navigation
 

Economic Impact of the Tailoring Rule

New Study Shows Tailoring Rule Leads to Harmful, Unintended Consequences

Update: Is biomass energy increasing despite the Tailoring Rule? NAFO addresses this claim here.

In December 2010, Forisk Consulting released a study titled, “Economic and Regional Impact Analysis of the Treatment of Biomass Energy Under the EPA Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule.”

The study found that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule’s current treatment of biomass energy emissions will put over 130 renewable energy projects “at risk” for cancellation or delays.

Additionally, by the year 2021 we are likely to see:

  • 5,384 fewer MW of renewable electricity generation in the US;
  • 11,844 to 26,380 fewer renewable energy jobs;
  • $18.0 billion fewer dollars of capital investment in renewable electricity generation; and
  • 53.4 million tons of wood biomass per year removed from the renewable energy marketplace.
  • Up to 30 states will not meet a national renewable electricity standard of 15% because of the Tailoring Rule; up from 19 states under the status quo.

The study also found that the Tailoring Rule has already contributed to stalled investment in at least 23 near-term projects.

Respected lifecycle analysts Dr. Bruce Lippke and Dr. Elaine Oneil recently published a paper discussing the Tailoring Rule’s other unintended consequences. [1] In addition to noting that the Tailoring Rule ignores hard science, the authors found:

The Tailoring Rule encourages fossil fuel use. “…[N]ew investment in bioenergy development will be discouraged and existing biofuel facilities may be motivated to shut down or use more fossil fuels.”

The Tailoring Rule contributes to increased GHG emissions from Federal Forests. “The EPA proposal will penalize the collection of forest residuals and thinnings on federal lands resulting in increased use of fossil fuels while also increasing the risk of carbon emitting unnatural disasters.”

The Tailoring Rule discounts the benefits of biomass over coal. According to peer-reviewed life-cycle analysis data from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, biomass energy generates only 4% of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of bituminous coal, a benefit that will be forfeited under the Tailoring Rule.

The National Alliance of Forest Owners encourages you to download both studies and distribute it to those who are interested in the future of renewable energy, jobs, and the economy in the United States. We also encourage you to take action and contact your U.S. Senator or U.S. Representative and tell them why the EPA needs to amend the Tailoring Rule’s treatment of biomass.

LATEST NEWS

  • WASHINGTON, DC, May 17, 2012 – Th More

  • WASHINGTON, DC, May 9, 2012 – The More

  • WASHINGTON, DC, March 20, 2012 – More

See All

LEGISLATIVE ACTION CENTER

Take action to conserve private forests.

More

FORESTRY JOURNAL

  • NAFO’s recommendations respond to the Biogenic Carbon Emissions Panel’s draft recommendations on EPA’s accounting framework for carbon emissions. More

  • A new report provides a concise primer to policy makers on the forest carbon cycle, carbon accounting, biomass energy emissions and other critical topics. More

  • New federal legislation will help timberland owners avoid costly permit fees for logging roads, U.S. Reps. Jaime Herrera Beutler and Kurt Schrader announced Monday. Under the new provision, a 35-year-old U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy would be extended for another year. It would shield timber companies from the cost of designing stormwater control systems for logging roads under the federal Clean Water Act. Landowners will not be required to get federal permits to build logging roads. More

See All
 
back on top