skip to main navigation
 

Posts Tagged ‘biomass’

Biomass from a tree farmer’s view

Monday, March 7th, 2011

A ninth-generation tree farmer in Massachusetts explains why forest owners won’t clear cut forests for biomass energy.

read more


Forest Conservation Requires a Workable Boiler MACT Rule

Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011

EPA’s Boiler MACT rule has the potential to significantly reduce forest product manufacturing the U.S., putting private, working forests at risk of conversion.

read more


EPA Recognizes the Benefits of Biomass Energy

Wednesday, January 12th, 2011

EPA takes a critical step toward recognizing the full carbon benefits of biomass as a leading source of renewable, domestic energy.

read more


Is Biomass Energy Increasing Under the Tailoring Rule?

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010

NAFO addresses the claim that biomass energy is on the rise despite the Tailoring Rule.

read more


Bipartisan Congressional group sends letter to EPA seeking stay/change of Tailoring Rule

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010

32 members of Congress urge the EPA to stay the implementation of the Tailoring Rule for biomass and propose a rulemaking to recognize the carbon benefits of biomass.

read more


EPA Tailoring Rule Jeopardizes Renewable Energy Investment, Jobs, Production Goals

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010

A recent study documents the unintended consequences of the EPA’s treatment of biomass energy in the Tailoring Rule.

read more


Unintended Consequences of the EPA’s Tailoring Rule

Thursday, December 9th, 2010

Scientists document that the EPA’s treatment of biomass energy in the Tailoring Rule will lead to increased fossil fuel use and a loss of domestic manufacturing jobs.

read more


EPA Should Clear Up Biomass Confusion

Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

NAFO’s files comments on the Tailoring Rule BACT – highlights scientists’ concerns over the unintended consequences.

read more


Forest Owners Tell MA: “Embrace biomass as a sustainable, low carbon source of renewable energy.”

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

NAFO submits official comments to the Massachusetts DOER on its proposed regulation of biomass energy.

read more


Massachusetts Should Embrace Renewable Forest Biomass Energy

Monday, October 18th, 2010

NAFO documents why renewable forest biomass energy is valuable to Massachusetts’ goals for renewable energy.

read more


LATEST NEWS

  • NAFO’s recommendations respond to the Biogenic Carbon Emissions Panel’s draft recommendations on EPA’s accounting framework for carbon emissions. More

  • A new report provides a concise primer to policy makers on the forest carbon cycle, carbon accounting, biomass energy emissions and other critical topics. More

  • New federal legislation will help timberland owners avoid costly permit fees for logging roads, U.S. Reps. Jaime Herrera Beutler and Kurt Schrader announced Monday. Under the new provision, a 35-year-old U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy would be extended for another year. It would shield timber companies from the cost of designing stormwater control systems for logging roads under the federal Clean Water Act. Landowners will not be required to get federal permits to build logging roads. More

See All

LEGISLATIVE ACTION CENTER

Take action to conserve private forests.

More

FORESTRY JOURNAL

  • NAFO’s recommendations respond to the Biogenic Carbon Emissions Panel’s draft recommendations on EPA’s accounting framework for carbon emissions. More

  • A new report provides a concise primer to policy makers on the forest carbon cycle, carbon accounting, biomass energy emissions and other critical topics. More

  • New federal legislation will help timberland owners avoid costly permit fees for logging roads, U.S. Reps. Jaime Herrera Beutler and Kurt Schrader announced Monday. Under the new provision, a 35-year-old U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy would be extended for another year. It would shield timber companies from the cost of designing stormwater control systems for logging roads under the federal Clean Water Act. Landowners will not be required to get federal permits to build logging roads. More

See All
 
back on top